Under 14,000 is not 13,834

The guide already failed its build on a key fact with no source. The new tier of short question pages and FAQ blocks opened a second way to be wrong: an answer that rounds, paraphrases or drifts from the fact it sits next to. These are the lines answer engines lift whole, so a reader repeating one cannot tell.

So every number in a quoted answer must now be one of the page’s own sourced figures, exactly. The matcher strips thousands separators, including the two non-breaking spaces, so “13,834” and “13834” agree. Sourced values are joined with a separator before scanning, because two values run together (“13,834 447”) would otherwise read as one number.

It failed on the first run. Three answers had rounded the sourced 13,834 to “under 14,000”. They now state the figure.

Three more gates went in beside it. A question is asked once across the site, as a page or an FAQ item, not both. One sourced fact has one value everywhere. Question pages clear 150 words and link their topic, and FAQ answers run 15 to 80 words.

The process caught what the gates could not. Wikidata’s registry link for Verdelho points at a different grape, so the page cites the registry entry directly. The page said the 85% rule applies to the must; the specification says the blend. The whale calendar said every species is absent in December and January, and sperm whales have records in both. The story that the wine reached the Russian court found no primary source, so it is told as a story.